Choose the outcome you need. Every Vantus service shows who it is for, what you receive, where responsibility stops, and what should happen next before a proposal is written.
The service, scope boundaries, and planning range you see here carry into the written proposal. If the fit changes, the proposal must say so.
Vantus responsibility field
Problem → ownership → proof
Public catalog
01
Pressure
What is getting in the way
02
Boundary
What Vantus will own
03
Evidence
How completion is proven
04
Handoff
What you keep and control
Start from the problem, not a package name
See scope and boundaries before a sales call
Understand the planning range before approval
Know what you will own when the work is done
Published responsibility atlas
See how the work fits together before choosing a service.
These families are generated from the currently published commercial catalog. They are not a second package list. Use the map to understand responsibility, then inspect the exact service scope below.
Use the guided finder to narrow the published catalog from the problem you are trying to solve.
Published responsibility catalog
Find the smallest clear engagement that solves the real problem.
58 published services
Strategy & Discovery
Defined engagement
Scoped
AI Application Launch Assurance
You built it fast with AI. Make sure it is ready for production.
Founders and teams preparing to launch a specific AI-built or AI-enabled application revision who need an evidence-backed readiness decision before production.
Common pressure points
AI-assisted implementation moved faster than the team's production-readiness review process
Security, data, billing, operational, accessibility, or AI-specific failure modes may be hidden across the stack
The team needs a launch decision tied to evidence and an exact revision rather than generic scanner output
Planning anchor
Custom scope; starts at $9,500
Bounded qualification first; delivery timing is confirmed in the written engagement after repository size, scope, authorization, and dependencies are verified.
When an incident hits, response starts immediately - not with procurement.
Leaderships that want pre-agreed response capacity, roles, and communication discipline in place before a security event forces decisions under pressure.
Common pressure points
Security controls exist but cannot be confidently explained or evidenced
Backup and recovery assumptions have not been validated against real restore tests
Planning anchor
Agreement-specific retainer
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Get the roadmap and budget clarity before committing to complex work.
Leaders facing a complex technology decision - a platform change, multi-system program, or major investment - who need requirements, options, and sequencing defined before commitment.
Common pressure points
Important technology decisions are being made without a reliable current-state picture
Ownership, dependencies, and vendor responsibilities are unclear
Planning anchor
Scoped discovery engagement
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Know what you have, what it costs, and what to fix first.
Owners and operators preparing a significant technology decision - a migration, consolidation, vendor change, or budget cycle - who need an evidence-based current state first.
Common pressure points
Technology spend keeps growing without a clear picture of what it supports
Critical systems depend on people, vendors, or access nobody fully controls
Planning anchor
Starts at $7,500
Bounded fixed-scope engagement; delivery timing is confirmed in the written engagement after environment size and access are verified.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Planning anchor
$500–$950/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Maintenance, security, and improvement happen only after something breaks
Planning anchor
$3,500–$6,500/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Planning anchor
$7,500–$12,000/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Planning anchor
Usually $15,000+/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Fleet-standard devices with patching, protection, and retirement under control.
Teams whose laptops, tablets, and phones handle business data and need consistent configuration, updates, and clean offboarding without manual tracking.
Common pressure points
Routine technology ownership is fragmented across people and providers
Support and administration happen reactively after something breaks
Planning anchor
Based on managed devices
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Hosting and cloud infrastructure operated to a standard you can audit.
Businesses whose applications and sites need accountable day-to-day operation - patching, backups, monitoring, and cost control - without hiring in-house infrastructure staff.
Common pressure points
Routine technology ownership is fragmented across people and providers
Support and administration happen reactively after something breaks
Nobody can clearly state what is covered, who owns it, or how changes are handled
Planning anchor
Based on systems, resources, and operational responsibility
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Prepare for HIPAA obligations with evidence, not promises.
Organizations handling protected health information that need technical readiness and evidence for HIPAA obligations without certification overclaiming.
Common pressure points
Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
Planning anchor
Typically $12,000–$135,000 based on scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.