Skip to content

Start with the business problem

Clear responsibility is the product.

Choose the outcome you need. Every Vantus service shows who it is for, what you receive, where responsibility stops, and what should happen next before a proposal is written.

Continuity promise

The service, scope boundaries, and planning range you see here carry into the written proposal. If the fit changes, the proposal must say so.

Vantus responsibility field

Problem → ownership → proof

Public catalog
  1. 01

    Pressure

    What is getting in the way

  2. 02

    Boundary

    What Vantus will own

  3. 03

    Evidence

    How completion is proven

  4. 04

    Handoff

    What you keep and control

Start from the problem, not a package name

See scope and boundaries before a sales call

Understand the planning range before approval

Know what you will own when the work is done

Published responsibility atlas

See how the work fits together before choosing a service.

These families are generated from the currently published commercial catalog. They are not a second package list. Use the map to understand responsibility, then inspect the exact service scope below.

01

Problem

What is getting in the way?

02

Boundary

What should Vantus own?

03

Evidence

What proves the work?

04

Handoff

What remains under client control?

Vantus service catalog

Not sure which responsibility fits?

Use the guided finder to narrow the published catalog from the problem you are trying to solve.

Published responsibility catalog

Find the smallest clear engagement that solves the real problem.

5 published services

Compliance Readiness

Compliance Readiness

Defined engagement

Scoped

HIPAA Readiness

Prepare for HIPAA obligations with evidence, not promises.

Organizations handling protected health information that need technical readiness and evidence for HIPAA obligations without certification overclaiming.

Common pressure points

  • Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
  • Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
  • The organization is approaching external scrutiny without a readiness baseline

Planning anchor

Typically $12,000–$135,000 based on scope

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Compliance Readiness

Defined engagement

Scoped

SOC 2 Readiness

Build SOC 2 readiness on real controls and reviewable evidence.

Companies pursuing SOC 2 that need real controls and reviewable evidence in place before an auditor engagement.

Common pressure points

  • Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
  • Technical controls and written expectations do not line up

Planning anchor

Typically $10,000–$140,000 based on scope

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Compliance Readiness

Defined engagement

Scoped

CMMC Readiness

Approach CMMC requirements with scoped preparation and honest gaps.

Defense-adjacent contractors that need scoped CMMC preparation built on honest gap assessment.

Common pressure points

  • Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
  • Technical controls and written expectations do not line up

Planning anchor

Typically $15,000–$185,000 based on scope

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Compliance Readiness

Defined engagement

Scoped

Compliance Evidence Refresh

Bring compliance evidence back to current before the next review.

Teams with stale compliance evidence approaching a customer review, audit, or renewal cycle.

Common pressure points

  • Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
  • Technical controls and written expectations do not line up

Planning anchor

Per-cycle scope

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Compliance Readiness

Defined engagement

Scoped

Pre-Assessment Readiness Review

A final readiness review before the auditor arrives.

Organizations about to enter an independent assessment that want gaps found by us first, not by the auditor.

Common pressure points

  • Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
  • Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
  • The organization is approaching external scrutiny without a readiness baseline

Planning anchor

Custom quote

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Privacy choices

We use required cookies for security, forms, and site operation. Optional privacy-preserving analytics only run if you allow them.

Read the cookie policy