Choose the outcome you need. Every Vantus service shows who it is for, what you receive, where responsibility stops, and what should happen next before a proposal is written.
The service, scope boundaries, and planning range you see here carry into the written proposal. If the fit changes, the proposal must say so.
Vantus responsibility field
Problem → ownership → proof
Public catalog
01
Pressure
What is getting in the way
02
Boundary
What Vantus will own
03
Evidence
How completion is proven
04
Handoff
What you keep and control
Start from the problem, not a package name
See scope and boundaries before a sales call
Understand the planning range before approval
Know what you will own when the work is done
Vantus service catalog
Not sure which responsibility fits?
Use the guided finder to narrow the published catalog from the problem you are trying to solve.
Published responsibility catalog
Find the smallest clear engagement that solves the real problem.
58 published services
Strategy & Discovery
Defined engagement
Scoped
AI Application Launch Assurance
You built it fast with AI. Make sure it is ready for production.
Founders and teams preparing to launch a specific AI-built or AI-enabled application revision who need an evidence-backed readiness decision before production.
Common pressure points
AI-assisted implementation moved faster than the team's production-readiness review process
Security, data, billing, operational, accessibility, or AI-specific failure modes may be hidden across the stack
The team needs a launch decision tied to evidence and an exact revision rather than generic scanner output
Planning anchor
Custom scope; starts at $9,500
Bounded qualification first; delivery timing is confirmed in the written engagement after repository size, scope, authorization, and dependencies are verified.
Know what you have, what it costs, and what to fix first.
Owners and operators preparing a significant technology decision - a migration, consolidation, vendor change, or budget cycle - who need an evidence-based current state first.
Common pressure points
Technology spend keeps growing without a clear picture of what it supports
Critical systems depend on people, vendors, or access nobody fully controls
Planning anchor
Starts at $7,500
Bounded fixed-scope engagement; delivery timing is confirmed in the written engagement after environment size and access are verified.
Owners and leadership teams that need ongoing technology judgment, prioritization, vendor governance, and accountability without adding a full-time executive role.
Common pressure points
Technology decisions lack a consistent owner
Vendors and priorities compete without a shared decision framework
Planning anchor
Monthly retainer based on responsibility and cadence
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Owners and leadership teams that need ongoing technology judgment, prioritization, vendor governance, and accountability without adding a full-time executive role.
Common pressure points
Technology decisions lack a consistent owner
Vendors and priorities compete without a shared decision framework
Planning anchor
Monthly retainer based on responsibility and cadence
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Owners and leadership teams that need ongoing technology judgment, prioritization, vendor governance, and accountability without adding a full-time executive role.
Common pressure points
Technology decisions lack a consistent owner
Vendors and priorities compete without a shared decision framework
Planning anchor
Monthly scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Owners and leadership teams that need ongoing technology judgment, prioritization, vendor governance, and accountability without adding a full-time executive role.
Common pressure points
Technology decisions lack a consistent owner
Vendors and priorities compete without a shared decision framework
Leadership sees spend but not a coherent technology roadmap
Planning anchor
Quarterly scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Owners and leadership teams that need ongoing technology judgment, prioritization, vendor governance, and accountability without adding a full-time executive role.
Common pressure points
Technology decisions lack a consistent owner
Vendors and priorities compete without a shared decision framework
Planning anchor
Custom scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Planning anchor
$500–$950/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Maintenance, security, and improvement happen only after something breaks
Planning anchor
$3,500–$6,500/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Planning anchor
$7,500–$12,000/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Clients that need ongoing stewardship for technology they own, with coverage, responsibilities, reporting, and boundaries defined in the Care agreement.
Common pressure points
A delivered system has no clear owner for ongoing stewardship
Documentation and operating knowledge drift after launch
Planning anchor
Usually $15,000+/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Businesses whose public website needs to establish trust, explain the offer clearly, support lead capture, and leave the client with a documented operating foundation.
Common pressure points
The current website weakens confidence or hides the next action
Lead capture and measurement are incomplete or disconnected
Planning anchor
Starts at $15,000
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Organizations preparing for a customer, auditor, assessor, insurer, or regulated-framework review that need technical readiness and evidence—not a certification promise.
Common pressure points
Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
Planning anchor
Typically $12,000–$135,000 based on scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Organizations preparing for a customer, auditor, assessor, insurer, or regulated-framework review that need technical readiness and evidence—not a certification promise.
Common pressure points
Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
The organization is approaching external scrutiny without a readiness baseline
Planning anchor
Typically $10,000–$140,000 based on scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Organizations preparing for a customer, auditor, assessor, insurer, or regulated-framework review that need technical readiness and evidence—not a certification promise.
Common pressure points
Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
Planning anchor
Typically $15,000–$185,000 based on scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Organizations preparing for a customer, auditor, assessor, insurer, or regulated-framework review that need technical readiness and evidence—not a certification promise.
Common pressure points
Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
Planning anchor
Per-cycle scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Organizations preparing for a customer, auditor, assessor, insurer, or regulated-framework review that need technical readiness and evidence—not a certification promise.
Common pressure points
Required evidence is incomplete or scattered
Technical controls and written expectations do not line up
Planning anchor
Custom quote
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Businesses with a stable owned foundation that need a defined growth, visibility, reputation, content, or measurement capability operated with clear scope.
Common pressure points
The business is difficult to find or inconsistently represented
Growth activity happens without clear ownership or measurement
Content, reputation, listings, and conversion work are disconnected
Planning anchor
Growth services commonly $350–$4,500/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Businesses with a stable owned foundation that need a defined growth, visibility, reputation, content, or measurement capability operated with clear scope.
Common pressure points
The business is difficult to find or inconsistently represented
Growth activity happens without clear ownership or measurement
Planning anchor
Growth services commonly $350–$4,500/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Businesses with a stable owned foundation that need a defined growth, visibility, reputation, content, or measurement capability operated with clear scope.
Common pressure points
The business is difficult to find or inconsistently represented
Growth activity happens without clear ownership or measurement
Planning anchor
Growth services commonly $350–$4,500/month
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Businesses with a stable owned foundation that need a defined growth, visibility, reputation, content, or measurement capability operated with clear scope.
Common pressure points
The business is difficult to find or inconsistently represented
Growth activity happens without clear ownership or measurement
Planning anchor
Custom monthly scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Businesses with a stable owned foundation that need a defined growth, visibility, reputation, content, or measurement capability operated with clear scope.
Common pressure points
The business is difficult to find or inconsistently represented
Growth activity happens without clear ownership or measurement
Content, reputation, listings, and conversion work are disconnected
Planning anchor
Custom monthly scope
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.
Businesses with a stable owned foundation that need a defined growth, visibility, reputation, content, or measurement capability operated with clear scope.
Common pressure points
The business is difficult to find or inconsistently represented
Growth activity happens without clear ownership or measurement
Planning anchor
Custom project or recurring cycle
Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.