Skip to content

Start with the business problem

Clear responsibility is the product.

Choose the outcome you need. Every Vantus service shows who it is for, what you receive, where responsibility stops, and what should happen next before a proposal is written.

Continuity promise

The service, scope boundaries, and planning range you see here carry into the written proposal. If the fit changes, the proposal must say so.

Vantus responsibility field

Problem → ownership → proof

Public catalog
  1. 01

    Pressure

    What is getting in the way

  2. 02

    Boundary

    What Vantus will own

  3. 03

    Evidence

    How completion is proven

  4. 04

    Handoff

    What you keep and control

Start from the problem, not a package name

See scope and boundaries before a sales call

Understand the planning range before approval

Know what you will own when the work is done

Vantus service catalog

Not sure which responsibility fits?

Use the guided finder to narrow the published catalog from the problem you are trying to solve.

Published responsibility catalog

Find the smallest clear engagement that solves the real problem.

5 published services

Strategy & Discovery

Strategy & Discovery

Defined engagement

Scoped

AI Application Launch Assurance

You built it fast with AI. Make sure it is ready for production.

Founders and teams preparing to launch a specific AI-built or AI-enabled application revision who need an evidence-backed readiness decision before production.

Common pressure points

  • AI-assisted implementation moved faster than the team's production-readiness review process
  • Security, data, billing, operational, accessibility, or AI-specific failure modes may be hidden across the stack
  • The team needs a launch decision tied to evidence and an exact revision rather than generic scanner output

Planning anchor

Custom scope; starts at $9,500

Bounded qualification first; delivery timing is confirmed in the written engagement after repository size, scope, authorization, and dependencies are verified.

Strategy & Discovery

Defined engagement

Scoped

Technology Discovery & Roadmap

Get the roadmap and budget clarity before committing to complex work.

Leaders facing a complex technology decision - a platform change, multi-system program, or major investment - who need requirements, options, and sequencing defined before commitment.

Common pressure points

  • Important technology decisions are being made without a reliable current-state picture
  • Ownership, dependencies, and vendor responsibilities are unclear

Planning anchor

Scoped discovery engagement

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Strategy & Discovery

Defined engagement

Scoped

Technology Assessment

Know what you have, what it costs, and what to fix first.

Owners and operators preparing a significant technology decision - a migration, consolidation, vendor change, or budget cycle - who need an evidence-based current state first.

Common pressure points

  • Technology spend keeps growing without a clear picture of what it supports
  • Critical systems depend on people, vendors, or access nobody fully controls

Planning anchor

Starts at $7,500

Bounded fixed-scope engagement; delivery timing is confirmed in the written engagement after environment size and access are verified.

Strategy & Discovery

Defined engagement

Scoped

Technology Due Diligence

Know exactly what you are acquiring before the deal closes.

Acquirers and investors who need a technical assessment of target systems, ownership, supportability, and hidden risk during diligence.

Common pressure points

  • Important technology decisions are being made without a reliable current-state picture
  • Ownership, dependencies, and vendor responsibilities are unclear

Planning anchor

Custom quote

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Strategy & Discovery

Defined engagement

Scoped

Vendor & Technology Review

Independent review of what your vendors actually built and left behind.

Businesses that received or purchased vendor-delivered systems and need an independent assessment of quality, ownership, and maintainability.

Common pressure points

  • Important technology decisions are being made without a reliable current-state picture
  • Ownership, dependencies, and vendor responsibilities are unclear
  • The business needs a practical sequence instead of another generic recommendation list

Planning anchor

Custom quote

Defined in the written scope after fit and dependencies are confirmed.

Privacy choices

We use required cookies for security, forms, and site operation. Optional privacy-preserving analytics only run if you allow them.

Read the cookie policy